Cigarette Products:

Buffalo Full Flavor Filter De Luxe Cigarettes Buffalo Full Flavor Cigarettes are reasonably priced, attractively-designed, 100% chemical-free, have a satisfying taste, and are Native American-made in the USA! The Buffalo Filter De Luxe cigarette brand is manufactured by the Tuscarora Indian Nation in New York, located just outside of the Niagara Falls. The Tuscarora Indian Nation also manufactures the following brands of Native American cigarettes - Smokin Joes 100% All Natural Cigarettes, Exact Elite Cigarettes, Lewiston Cigarettes, and Market Cigarettes. Buffalo Full Flavor DeLuxe Filtered Cigarettes Buffalo Full Flavor Soft Pack 100's The Buffalo Deluxe cigarette brand is an elegantly-flavored blend of tobacco that is available in six different flavors - Full Flavor, Light, Ultra Light, Menthol, Menthol Light, and Full Flavor Non-Filter. The Buffalo Filter De Luxe 100's Cigarettes are packaged in both hard and soft packs. The Buffalo Deluxe 100's Cigarettes come in sturdy hard packs. If you would like to place an order for the Buffalo Full Flavor Filter De Luxe brand of Cigarettes, please call 1-877-448-6222. Sample pack orders are also available.

The Social History of Smoking

George Latimer Apperson

Chapter 5:

Among the many medicinal virtues attributed to tobacco was its supposed value as a preservative from contagion at times of plague. Hearne, the antiquary, writing early in 1721, said that he had been told that in the Great Plague of London of 1665 none of those who kept tobacconists' shops suffered from it, and this belief no doubt enhanced the medical reputation of the weed. I have also seen it stated that during the cholera epidemics of 1831, 1849, and 1866 not one London tobacconist died from that disease; but good authority for the statement seems to be lacking. Hutton, in his "History of Derby," says that when that town was visited by the plague in 1665, that at the "Headless-cross ... the market-people, having their mouths primed with tobacco as a preservative, brought their provisions.... It was observed, that this cruel affliction never attempted the premises of a tobacconist, a tanner or a shoemaker." Whatever ground there may have been for the belief in the prophylactic effect of smoking, there can be no doubt that in the seventeenth century it was firmly held. Howell in one of his "Familiar Letters" dated January 1, 1646, says that the smoke of tobacco is "one of the wholesomest sents that is against all contagious airs, for it overmasters all other smells, as King James they say found true, when being once a hunting, a showr of rain drave him into a Pigsty for shelter, wher he caus'd a pipe full to Be taken of purpose." But here Mr. Howell is certainly drawing the long-bow. One cannot imagine the author of the "Counterblaste" countenancing the use of tobacco under any circumstances.

Read More

The Social History of Smoking

George Latimer Apperson

Chapter 13:

Although, according to M. Misson, the women of Devon and Cornwall might wonder why the women of Middlesex did not take tobacco, it is certain that London and its neighbourhood did contain at least a few female smokers. Tom Brown, often dubbed "the facetious," but to whom a sterner epithet might well be applied, writing about the end of the seventeenth century, mentions a vintner's wife who, having "made her pile," as might be said nowadays, retires to a little country-house at Hampstead, where she drinks sack too plentifully, smokes tobacco in an elbow-chair, and snores away the remainder of her life. And the same writer was responsible for a satirical letter "to an Old Lady that smoak'd Tobacco," which shows that the practice was not general, for the letter begins: "Madam, Tho' the ill-natur'd world censures you for smoaking." Brown advised her to continue the "innocent diversion" because, first, it was good for the toothache, "the constant persecutor of old ladies," and, secondly, it was a great help to meditation, "which is the reason, I suppose," he continues, "that recommends it to your parsons; the generality of whom can no more write a sermon without a pipe in their mouths, than a concordance in their hands."

Read More